Alexander, I. 1998, 'Requirements engineering as a co-operative inquiry: A framework', Proceedings of the Conference on European Industrial Requirements Engineering CEIRE '98, London, UK.
Batra, D. and Davis, J. G. 1992, 'Conceptual data modelling in database design: Similarities and differences between expert and novice designers', International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 37, pp. 83-101.
Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S. and Purcell, T. 2006, 'To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question', Design Studies, in Press.
Blackburn, T., Swatman, P. and Vernik, R. 2005, 'Extending CSCW theories to model and support creative group processes', InSyL Working Papers, School of Computer and Information Science, University of South Australia.
Boden, M. A. 1991, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Basic Books.
Boehm, B. W. 1981, Software Engineering Economics, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
Chaiyasut, P. and Shanks, G. 1994, 'Conceptual data modelling process: A study of novice and expert data modellers', Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Object-Role Modelling, Magnetic Island, Queensland, Australia.
Conklin, J. 2005, Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems, John Wiley and Sons.
Cybulski, J., Nguyen, L., Thanasankit, T. and Lichtenstein, S. 2003, 'understanding problem solving in requirements engineering: debating creativity with IS practitioners', Proceedings of the 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS'2003, Adelaide, Australia.
Dallman, S., Nguyen, L., Lamp, J. and Cybulski, J. 2005, 'Contextual factors which influence creativity in requirements engineering', Proceedings of 13th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2005, Regensburg, Germany.
Daupert, D. 2002, The Osborne-Parnes Creative Problem Solving Process Manual.
Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H. and Tegarden, D. 2002, Systems Analysis and Design An Object-Oriented Approach with UML, John Wiley and Sons.
Dorst, K. and Cross, N. 2001, 'Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem—solution', Design Studies, vol. 22, pp. 425—37.
Dorst, K. and Dijkhuis, J. 1995, 'Comparing paradigms for describing design activity', Design Studies, vol. 16, pp. 261-74.
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1993, Protocol Analysis Verbal Reports as Data, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Gero, J. S. 1996, 'Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: Concepts and framework', Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 435-48.
Gero, J. S. and Neill, T. M. 1998, 'An approach to the analysis of design protocols', Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 21-61.
Gero, J. S. and Tang, H.-H. 2001, 'The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspecs of the design process', Design Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 283-95.
Guindon, R. 1990a, 'Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts', Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 305-44.
Guindon, R. 1990b, 'Knowledge exploited by experts during software system design', International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 33, pp. 279-304.
Hofmann, H. F. and Lehner, F. 2001, 'Requirements engineering as a success factor in software projects', IEEE Software, vol. 18, no. 4 pp. 58-66.
Kaplan, S. M. 1990, 'COED: A conversation-oriented tool for coordinating design work', in Finkelstein, A., Tauber, M. J. and Traunmuller, R. (eds), Human Factors in Information Systems Analysis and Design, North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 123-42.
Khushalani, A., Smith, R. and Howard, S. 1994, 'What happens when designers don't play by the rules: Towards a model of opportunistic behaviour in design', Australian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 13-31.
Kotonya, G. and Sommerville, I. 1998, Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques, West Sussex, England, John Wiley and Sons.
Kuusela, H. and Pallab, P. 2000, 'A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis', American Journal of Psychology, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 387-404.
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B. and Scott, P. 1995, 'Can concurrent verbalisation reveal design cognition?', Design Studies, vol. 16, pp. 237-59.
Loucopoulos, P. and Karakostas, V. 1995, System Requirements Engineering, New York McGraw-Hill.
Lubars, M., Potts, C. and Richter, C. 1993, 'A review of the state of the practice in requirements modelling', Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering RE'93, San Diego, California, IEEE Computer Society Press.
Maiden, N. and Gizikis, A. 2001, 'Where do requirements come from?', IEEE Software, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 10-2.
Maiden, N. and Robertson, S. 2005, 'Integrating creativity into requirements engineering process: Experiences with an air traffic management system', Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05), Paris.
Maiden, N. and Rugg, G. 1996, 'ACRE: Selecting methods for requirements acquisition', Software Engineering Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 183-92.
Mayer, R. E. 1992, Thinking, Problem solving, Cognition, New York, W. H. Freeman and Company.
Neuman, W. L. 2003, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Allyn and Bacon.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. 1972, Human Problem Soving, Englewood, Prentice-Hall.
Nguyen, L., Carroll, J. and Swatman, P. A. 2000, 'Supporting and monitoring the creativity of IS personnel during the requirements engineering process', Proceedings of the 33rd Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS-33, Maui, Hawaii.
Nguyen, L. and Shanks, G. 2006, 'Exploring creativity elements in requirements engineering', Forthcoming.
Nguyen, L. and Swatman, P. A. 2003, 'Managing the requirements engineering process', Requirements Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55-68.
Nguyen, L. and Swatman, P. A. 2006, 'Promoting and supporting requirements engineering creativity', in Dutoit, A. H., McCall, R., Mistrik, I. and Paech, B. (eds), Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag.
Nuseibeh, B. A. and Easterbrook, S. M. 2000, Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap, IEEE Computer Society Press.
Ohlsson, S. 1984, 'I. Restructuring revisited: Summary and critique of the gestalt theory of problem solving', Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 65-78.
Osborn, A. F. 1979, Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons.
Owen, S., Budgen, D. and Brereton, P. 2006, 'Protocol analysis: A neglected practice', Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 117-22.
Plsek, P. E. 1997, Creativity, Innovation, and Quality, Quality Press
Plucker, J. A. and Beghetto, R. A. 2004, 'Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matte', in Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. G. and Singer, J. L. (eds), Creativity: From Potential to Realisation, American Psychological Association (APA).
Pohl, K. 1994, 'Three dimensions of requirements engineering: A framework and its application', Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 243-58.
Raisey, D., Tan, K., Swatman, P., Blackburn, T. and Nguyen, V. 2005, 'An empirical study of the evolving dynamics of creative teams in action', InSyl Working Papers, School of Computer and Information Science, University of South Australia.
Robertson, J. 2002, 'Eureka! Why analysts should invent requirements', IEEE Software, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 20-2.
Robertson, J. 2005, 'Requirements analysts must also be inventors', IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 48, 50.
Robillard, P. N. 2005, 'Opportunistic problem solving in software engineering', IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 60-7.
Schön, D. A. 1983, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London England, Temple Smith.
Schön, D. A. 1996, 'Reflective conversation with materials', in Winograd, T. (ed.) Bringing Design to Software, New York, ACM Press, pp. 171-84.
Shanks, G., Tansley, E. and Weber, R. 2003, 'Using ontology to help validate conceptual models', Communictions of the ACM, vol.46, pp. 85-89.
Shneiderman, B. 2000, 'Creating creativity: User Interfaces for supporting innovation', ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 114-38.
Simon, H. A. 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Simsion, G. C. 2006, 'Data modelling: Description or design?', unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stempfle, J. and Badke-Schaub, P. 2002, 'Thinking in design teams — an analysis of team communication', Design Studies, vol. 23, pp. 473-96.
Sternberg, R. J. 2005, 'Creativity or creativities?', International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 63, pp. 370-82.
Sutcliffe, A. G. and Maiden, N. A. M. 1992, 'Analysing the novice analyst: Cognitive models in software engineering', International Journal Man-Machine Studies, vol. 36, pp. 719-40.
Suwa, M., Purcell, T. and Gero, J. 1998, 'Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions', Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 455-83.
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B. 1997, 'What do architects and perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis', Design Studies, vol. 18, pp. 385-403.
Tang, H.-H. and Gero, J. S. 2000, 'Content-oriented coding scheme for protocol analysis and computer-aided architectural design', Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA2000, Singapore.
Visser, W. 1994, 'Organisation of design activities: Opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes', Interacting with Computers, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 235-74.
Wallas, G. 1926, The Art of Thought, London England, Jonathan Cape.
Ward, T. B. and Finke, R. A. 1999, 'Creative cognition', in Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-212.