The context

Table of Contents

1. The information systems discipline in Australian universities: a contextual framework
Introduction
Features of the second phase
The ‘parent’ IS in Pacific-Asia study (IS-in-PA) design
The phase one Australian study (IS-in-Oz) design
Study questions in phase one of the IS-in-Oz study
The literature
Past studies of the IS discipline
Relevant theory
Study approach
Overview
The state case studies
Mechanisms to increase representativeness
Methodological action research
Study overview
The IS discipline in Australian universities: a contextual framework
A retrospective of the IS discipline in Australia
Characterising academic IS in Australia: developing and evaluating a theoretical framework
The IS discipline in Queensland, 2006
The IS discipline in the Australian Capital Territory, 2006
The IS discipline in New South Wales, 2006, and response
IS in South Australia: a critical investigation
The IS discipline in Tasmania, 2006
The IS discipline in Victoria, 2006
IS teaching and research in WA universities
A longitudinal study of IS research in Australia
The IS academic discipline in Australian universities: a meta-analysis
The Australasian Conference on Information Systems
ACIS archival analysis
Conclusion
Communicating study results
Limitations
References
Appendix 1.1: The information systems academic discipline in Australian universities—a multi-state case-study protocol
Overview of the multiple case study
The study team
Purpose of the case-study protocol
Type of case study
Background to the current study
Theoretical framework
Approach to data gathering
Ethical considerations
Preparation for the interview
Starting interviews
Recommended data to be gathered from each interview
Acknowledgements
2. A retrospective of the information systems discipline in Australia
Introduction
Origins and nature of the IS discipline
The foundation years overseas
Europe
North America
The first 40–50 years in Australia
Until 1960
From 1960 to 1973
From 1974 to 1987
Since 1988
Drivers and scope
Political dimensions
International orientation and impact
Discipline size and staff location
Relationships with the IS profession
Relationships with industry
Political weakness and resource constraints
Intellectual dimensions
The research domain
Research techniques
Conclusions
Select bibliography
Appendix 2.1: Professors
The basis of the compilation
List by institution
List by person
Appendix 2.2: Early Australian PhDs in IS
Appendix 2.3: The early international impact of Australian IS
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement of bias
Acknowledgements of others
Vale Cyril Brookes
3. Characterising academic information systems in Australia
Introduction
IS as a discipline or field
Approaches to the development of disciplines
Largely independent approaches to explain disciplinary development
Combined approaches to explain disciplinary development
Motivation to understand the nature and development of a discipline
Vignettes of disciplinary development
An analysis of the literature to develop a framework
Methodology
Results
Discussion and findings
Framework development
Adaptability of framework to future change in IS
Review of the recent literature on pragmatism
Testing the placement of pragmatism in the framework
Applicability of the framework to IS in other world regions
Applying the framework to IS in North America: a comment from Professor Bob Zmud, from the Price College of Business at the University of Oklahoma, USA
Applying the framework to IS in the United Kingdom: a comment from Professors Frank Land, from the London School of Economics, and Antony Bryant, from the School of Information Management at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK
Applying the framework to IS in Scandinavia: a comment from Professor Karlheinz Kautz, from the Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Collating international views on the framework
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Select bibliography