|
Economy |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2000–05(average) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I. Newly industrialising economies (NIEs) |
|||||||
|
Republic of Korea |
8.5 |
3.8 |
7.0 |
3.1 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
5.2 |
|
Hong Kong |
10.2 |
0.5 |
1.9 |
3.2 |
8.1 |
5.7 |
4.9 |
|
Singapore |
9.7 |
–1.8 |
3.2 |
1.4 |
8.4 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
|
Taiwan |
5.8 |
–2.2 |
3.9 |
3.3 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
|
Average NIEs |
8.6 |
0.1 |
4.0 |
2.8 |
6.7 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
II. Second-tier NIEs |
|||||||
|
Malaysia |
8.9 |
0.3 |
4.1 |
5.3 |
7.1 |
5.7 |
5.2 |
|
Thailand |
4.8 |
2.2 |
5.3 |
6.9 |
6.1 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
|
Indonesia |
4.9 |
3.8 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
5.1 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
|
Average second-tier NIEs |
6.2 |
2.1 |
4.6 |
5.7 |
6.1 |
5.6 |
5.1 |
|
III. Other developing countries |
|||||||
|
China |
8.0 |
7.5 |
8.3 |
9.3 |
9.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
|
Vietnam |
6.1 |
5.8 |
6.4 |
7.1 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
6.8 |
|
India |
4.4 |
5.8 |
4.0 |
8.5 |
6.5 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
|
Pakistan |
3.9 |
1.8 |
3.1 |
5.1 |
6.4 |
7.0 |
4.6 |
|
Philippines |
4.4 |
1.8 |
4.3 |
4.7 |
6.1 |
5.0 |
4.4 |
|
Sri Lanka |
6.0 |
–1.5 |
4.0 |
5.9 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
4.2 |
|
Average other developing countries |
5.5 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
6.9 |
6.7 |
5.8 |
|
IV. Least-developed countries |
|||||||
|
Bhutan |
5.5 |
7.1 |
6.7 |
6.5 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
6.8 |
|
Laos |
5.8 |
5.8 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
6.5 |
7.0 |
6.2 |
|
Bangladesh |
5.9 |
5.3 |
4.4 |
5.3 |
5.5 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
|
Cambodia |
7.0 |
5.6 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
6.0 |
2.3 |
5.3 |
|
Nepal |
6.0 |
4.8 |
–0.4 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
|
Average least-developed countries |
6.0 |
5.7 |
4.4 |
5.2 |
5.7 |
5.1 |
5.4 |
|
Average all selected (18) countries above |
6.6 |
2.9 |
4.5 |
5.1 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
|
Myanmar |
13.7 |
11.3 |
12.0 |
13.8 |
13.6 |
13.2 |
12.9 |
Source: Asian Development Bank 2005, Key Indicators of Developing Asian and Pacific Countries, Online Edition, Asian Development Bank, Manila. Source for Myanmar: Ministry of National Planning and Economic Development, Yangon.
Appendix Table 4.2 GDI, selected Asian countries, 2000–05 (per cent of GDP)
|
Economy |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2000–05 (average) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I. Newly industrialising economies (NIEs) |
|||||||
|
Republic of Korea |
28.3 |
27.0 |
26.1 |
29.4 |
30.2 |
30.1 |
28.5 |
|
Hong Kong |
28.1 |
25.3 |
22.8 |
21.9 |
21.8 |
20.5 |
23.4 |
|
Singapore |
32.0 |
26.5 |
23.7 |
15.6 |
19.4 |
18.6 |
22.6 |
|
Taiwan |
22.9 |
18.4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
21.5 |
20.2 |
19.6 |
|
Average NIEs |
27.8 |
24.3 |
22.5 |
21.1 |
23.2 |
22.4 |
23.6 |
|
II. Second-tier NIEs |
|||||||
|
Malaysia |
27.2 |
23.9 |
24.0 |
21.6 |
22.6 |
19.8 |
23.2 |
|
Thailand |
22.8 |
24.1 |
23.8 |
24.9 |
27.1 |
31.6 |
25.7 |
|
Indonesia |
16.1 |
23.5 |
20.4 |
17.3 |
21.3 |
21.3 |
20.0 |
|
Average second-tier NIEs |
22.0 |
23.8 |
22.7 |
21.3 |
23.7 |
24.2 |
23.0 |
|
III. Other developing countries |
|||||||
|
China |
36.3 |
34.2 |
35.2 |
38.0 |
39.3 |
43.5 |
37.8 |
|
Vietnam |
23.9 |
31.2 |
33.2 |
35.4 |
35.5 |
35.4 |
32.4 |
|
India |
24.4 |
23.0 |
25.3 |
27.2 |
30.1 |
- |
26.0 |
|
Pakistan |
16.0 |
17.2 |
16.8 |
16.9 |
17.3 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
Philippines |
29.1 |
19.0 |
17.7 |
16.7 |
17.1 |
15.7 |
19.2 |
|
Sri Lanka |
28.1 |
22.0 |
21.3 |
22.3 |
25.8 |
27.0 |
24.4 |
|
Average other developing countries |
26.3 |
24.4 |
24.9 |
26.1 |
27.5 |
27.7 |
26.2 |
|
IV. Least-developed countries |
|||||||
|
Laos |
20.5 |
21.0 |
21.2 |
21.2 |
22.0 |
22.0 |
21.3 |
|
Bangladesh |
23.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
23.4 |
24.0 |
24.4 |
23.5 |
|
Cambodia |
17.3 |
18.7 |
20.1 |
25.1 |
25.8 |
26.4 |
22.2 |
|
Nepal |
24.3 |
24.1 |
24.2 |
25.8 |
26.4 |
25.7 |
25.1 |
|
Average least-developed countries |
21.3 |
21.7 |
22.2 |
23.9 |
24.6 |
24.6 |
23.1 |
|
Average all selected (17) countries above |
24.4 |
23.6 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
24.8 |
24.7 |
24.0 |
|
Myanmar |
12.4 |
11.6 |
10.4 |
11.0 |
12.0 |
- |
11.5 |
Source: Asian Development Bank 2004 and 2006, Asian Development Outlook. Source for Myanmar: Ministry of National Planning and Economic Development, Yangon.
Appendix Table 4.3 Myanmar: GDP at 2000/01 constant prices, and GDI as ratio of GDP, 1999/2000–2005/06
|
Fiscal year |
GDP (million kyat) |
GDP change from previous year (%) |
GDI/GDP ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1999/2000 |
2 246 035 |
10.9 |
13.4 |
|
2000/01 |
2 553 742 |
13.7 |
12.4 |
|
2001/02 |
2 842 314 |
11.3 |
11.6 |
|
2002/03 |
3 183 392 |
12.0 |
10.4 |
|
2003/04 |
3 622 700 |
13.8 |
11.0 |
|
2004/05 |
4 115 387 |
13.6 |
12.0 |
|
2005/06 |
4 658 619 |
13.2 |
n.a. |
|
Total |
88.5 |
- |
|
|
Average |
12.6 |
11.8a |
a average for years 1999/00 to 2004/05
Notes: GDI = total investment + stock changes; GDP figures are calculated from data in the Statistical Yearbook and using growth rates given in tables in Paras (11) and (14) of Myanmar’s Economic Development; GDI figure for 2003/04 is from UNCTAD 2005, Handbook of Statistics, Table 7.3, p. 349; GDI figure for 2004/05 is from UNCTAD 2006, LDC Report 2006, Annex Table 6, p. 316.
Sources: Ministry of National Planning and Economic Development 2006, Myanmar’s Economic Development, December 2006; Central Statistical Organisation 2003, Statistical Yearbook.
|
Fiscal year |
GDP (million kyat) |
GDP change from previous year (%) |
GDI/GDP ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1948/49 |
3200 |
–10.0 |
n.a. |
|
1949/50 |
3038 |
–5.1 |
n.a. |
|
1950/51 |
3431 |
12.9 |
12.9 |
|
1951/52 |
3636 |
6.0 |
18.2 |
|
1952/53 |
3899 |
7.2 |
19.0 |
|
1953/54 |
4073 |
4.5 |
22.0 |
|
1954/55 |
4294 |
5.4 |
21.0 |
|
1955/56 |
4456 |
3.8 |
18.0 |
|
1956/57 |
4934 |
10.7 |
19.9 |
|
1957/58 |
4778 |
–3.2 |
22.0 |
|
1958/59 |
5195 |
8.7 |
19.4 |
|
1959/60 |
5600 |
7.8 |
18.7 |
|
1960/61 |
5563 |
–0.7 |
16.3 |
|
Total |
63.2 |
207.3 |
|
|
Average (1950/51–1960/61) |
5.8 |
18.8 |
Sources: Government of Burma 1955, 1962, 1963, Economic Survey of Burma.
Appendix Table 4.5 Myanmar: GDP at 1969/70 constant prices, and GDI as a ratio of GDP, 1961/62–1970/71
|
Fiscal year |
GDP (million kyat) |
GDP change from previous year (%) |
GDI/GDP ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1961/62 |
7798 |
3.6 |
11.4 |
|
1962/63 |
8811 |
13.0 |
10.6 |
|
1963/64 |
8272 |
–6.1 |
10.6 |
|
1964/65 |
9106 |
10.1 |
18.4 |
|
1965/66 |
8715 |
–4.3 |
4.3 |
|
1966/67 |
8355 |
–4.1 |
12.2 |
|
1967/68 |
9200 |
10.1 |
15.8 |
|
1968/69 |
9503 |
3.3 |
12.8 |
|
1969/70 |
9976 |
5.0 |
14.2 |
|
1970/71 |
10 388 |
4.1 |
11.8 |
|
Total |
34.6 |
122.0 |
|
|
Average |
3.5 |
12.2 |
Sources: Ministry of Planning and Finance, 1972/73 and 1975/76, Report to the Pyithu Hluttaw.
|
Fiscal year |
GDP (million kyat) |
GDP change from previous year (%) |
GDI/GDP ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1970/71 |
10 388 |
4.1 |
11.8 |
|
1971/72 |
10 641 |
2.4 |
12.2 |
|
1972/73 |
10 538 |
–1.0 |
10.8 |
|
1973/74 |
10 812 |
2.6 |
10.2 |
|
1974/75 |
11 101 |
2.7 |
9.0 |
|
1975/76 |
11 562 |
4.2 |
9.9 |
|
1976/77 |
12 265 |
6.1 |
10.3 |
|
1977/78 |
12 996 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
|
1978/79 |
13 843 |
6.5 |
18.2 |
|
1979/80 |
14 562 |
5.2 |
22.3 |
|
Total |
38.8 |
127.7 |
|
|
Average |
3.9 |
12.8 |
Sources: Ministry of Planning and Finance 1979/80 and 1984/85, Report to the Pyithu Hluttaw.
Appendix Table 4.7 Myanmar: GDP at 1985/86 constant prices, and GDI as a ratio of GDP, 1980/81–1989/90
|
Fiscal year |
GDP (million kyat) |
GDP change from previous year (%) |
GDI/GDP ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1980/81 |
44 338 |
7.9 |
21.5 |
|
1981/82 |
47 157 |
6.4 |
22.9 |
|
1982/83 |
49 714 |
5.4 |
22.2 |
|
1983/84 |
51 878 |
4.3 |
18.0 |
|
1984/85 |
54 437 |
4.9 |
15.1 |
|
1985/86 |
55 989 |
2.9 |
15.5 |
|
1986/87 |
55 397 |
–1.1 |
12.7 |
|
1987/88 |
53 178 |
–4.0 |
11.6 |
|
1988/89 |
47 141 |
–11.4 |
12.8 |
|
1989/90 |
48 883 |
3.7 |
9.2 |
|
Total |
19.1 |
161.5 |
|
|
Average |
1.9 |
16.1 |
Sources: Ministry of Planning and Finance 1984/85, Report to the Pyithu Hluttaw; Central Statistical Organisation 1991, Statistical Yearbook.
|
Fiscal year |
GDP (million kyat) |
GDP change from previous year (%) |
GDI/GDP ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1990/91 |
50 260 |
2.8 |
13.4 |
|
1991/92 |
49 933 |
–0.7 |
15.3 |
|
1992/93 |
54 757 |
9.7 |
17.6 |
|
1993/94 |
58 064 |
6.0 |
12.4 |
|
1994/95 |
62 406 |
7.5 |
12.4 |
|
1995/96 |
66 742 |
7.0 |
14.2 |
|
1996/97 |
71 042 |
6.4 |
12.3 |
|
1997/98 |
75 123 |
5.7 |
12.5 |
|
1998/99 |
79 460 |
5.8 |
12.4 |
|
1999/00 |
88 157 |
10.9 |
13.4 |
|
Total |
61.2 |
135.9 |
|
|
Average |
6.1 |
13.6 |
Sources: Central Statistical Organisation 1995, 1997 and 2003, Statistical Yearbook.