Aitken, R., Creely, K. and Tran, C. 2004, Nanoparticles: An occupational hygiene review, Institute of Occupational Medicine for the Health and Safety Executive, Edinburgh.
Almas, R. and Lawrence, G. 2003, Globalisation, Localisation and Sustainable Livelihoods, Ashgate, Aldershot.
Associated Press 2006a, ‘City of Berkeley wants to monitor nanotechnology’, Los Angeles Times, 12 December, p. B1.
Associated Press 2006b, ‘Berkeley first city in nation to regulate nanotechnology’, Mercury News, 13 December.
Balbus, J. M., Florini, K., Denison, R. and Walsh, S. 2006, ‘Getting it right the first time—developing nanotechnology while protecting workers, public health and the environment’, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, vol. 1076, pp. 331–42.
Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds) 2002, Biotechnology: The making of a global controversy, Cambridge University Press, London.
Berkeley City Council 2006, Agenda—Berkeley City Council Meeting, 5 December, Berkeley City Council, Berkeley.
Bonanno, A., Busch, L., Friedland, W., Gouveia, L. and Mingione, E. 1994, ‘Introduction’, in A. Bonanno, L. Busch. W. Friedland, L. Gouveia and E. Mingione (eds), From Columbus to ConAgra. The globalisation of agriculture and food, University Press of Kansas, United States, pp. 1–26.
Bowman, D. and Fitzharris, M. 2007, ‘Too small for concern? Public health and nanotechnology’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 382–4.
Bowman, D. and Hodge, G. 2006, ‘Nanotechnology: mapping the wild regulatory frontier’, Futures, vol. 38, pp. 1060–73.
Bowman, D. and Hodge, G. 2007a, ‘A small matter of regulation: an international review of nanotechnology regulation’, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, vol. 8, pp. 1–32.
Bowman, D. and Hodge, G. 2007b, Governing nanotechnology without government?, Paper presented at the Law and Society in the 21st Century Conference, Berlin, 25–28 July.
Bowman, D. and Hodge, G. 2007c, ‘Nanotechnology “down under”: getting on top of regulatory matters’, Nanotechnology Law & Business, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 223–33.
Busch, L., Lacy, W., Burkhardt, J. and Lacy, L. 1991, Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, economic, and ethical consequences of the new biotechnologies, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.
Chaudhry, Q., Blackburn, J., Floyd, P., George, C., Nwaogu, T., Boxall, A. and Aitken, R. 2006, Final Report: A scoping study to identify gaps in environmental regulation for the products and applications of nanotechnologies, Defra, London.
Chaudhry, Q., George, C. and Watkins, R. 2007, ‘Nanotechnology regulation: developments in the United Kingdom’, in G. Hodge, D. Bowman and K. Ludlow (eds), New Global Regulatory Frontiers in Regulation: The age of nanotechnology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 212–38.
Cobb, M. D. and Macoubrie, J. 2004, ‘Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust’, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 395–405.
Crow, M. and Sarewitz, D. 2001, ‘Nanotechnology and societal transformation’, in M. C. Roco and W. S. Bainbridge (eds), Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 45–54.
Davies, J. C. 2006, Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Del Vecchio, R. 2006, ‘Berkeley considering need for nano safety’, San Francisco Chronicle, 24 November, p. A1.
Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources (DITR) 2006, Request for Tender: Requirements—review of possible impacts of nanotechnology on Australia’s regulatory frameworks, Australian Government, Canberra.
Dunkley, R. 2004, ‘Nanotechnology: social consequences and future implications’, Futures, vol. 36, pp. 1129–32.
ETC Group 2002, No small matter! Nanotech particles penetrate living cells and accumulate in animal organs, Communiqué Issue no. 76, ETC Group, Ottawa.
ETC Group 2003, No Small Matter II: The case for a global moratorium size matters!, ETC Group, Ottawa.
ETC Group 2004a, Down on the Farm, ETC Group, Ottawa.
ETC Group 2004b, Nanotech news in living colour: an update on white papers, red flags, green goo, grey goo (and red herrings), Communiqué Issue No. 85, ETC Group, Ottawa.
Friends of the Earth 2006a, Nanotoxicity and health: the big risks posed by small particles, Issue Summary, Friends of the Earth, Fitzroy, <http://nano.foe.org.au/filestore2/download/123/Nanotoxicity %20and%20health%20-%20Issue%20Summary%20May%202006.pdf>
Friends of the Earth 2006b, An Analysis by Friends of the Earth of the National Nanotechnology Strategy Taskforce Report: Options for a national nanotechnology strategy, Friends of the Earth, Melbourne.
Friends of the Earth 2007, International Union of Food Workers calls for moratorium on nanotechnology in food and agriculture, Press release, Friends of the Earth, Fitzroy, <http://www.foe.org.au/media-releases/2007/international-union-of-food-workers- calls-for-moratorium-on-nanotechnology-in-food-and-agriculture/>
Gardener, E. 2002, ‘Brainy food: academia, industry sinks their teeth into edible nano’, Small Times, 21 June.
Gaskell, G., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N. et al. 2006, Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends, European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research, London.
Goodman, D., Sorj, B. and Wilkinson, J. 1987, From Farming to Biotechnology. A theory of agro-industrial development, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Helmut Kaiser 2004, Study: Nanotechnology in food and food processing industry wide 2003–2006–2010–2015, Helmut Kaiser Consultancy, Tübingen, Germany.
Huang, J., Hu, R., Pray, C. et al. 2003, ‘Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China’, Agricultural Economics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 55–67.
International Centre for Technology Assessment 2006, Legal petition on the FDA’s failure to regulate health threats from nanomaterials, CTA, Washington, DC, <http://www.icta.org/doc/Nano%20petition%20ex%20summary.pdf>
Jones, S. 2004, ‘Progress without patents: public maintenance of agricultural knowledge’, Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 469–71.
Kimbrell, G. A. 2006, ‘Nanomaterial consumer products and FDA regulation: regulatory challenges and necessary amendments’, Nanotechnology Law & Business, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 329–38.
Kuzma, J. and VerHage, P. 2006, Nanotechnology in Agriculture and Food Production: Anticipated applications, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Lawrence, G. 1987, Capitalism and the Countryside: The rural crisis in Australia, Pluto Press, Sydney.
Ludlow, K. 2004, ‘Cultivating chaos: state responses to releases of genetically modified organisms’, Deakin Law Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–39.
Ludlow, K. 2005, ‘Regulation on agricultural genetically modified organisms in Australia’, International Journal of Biotechnology Law, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123–9.
Lux Research Incorporated 2005, Nanotechnology: where does the US stand?, Testimony before the Research Subcommittee of the House Committee on Science, Lux Research Inc., New York.
Macfarlane, I. 2006, Report into the technology of the small—nanotech, Media release, 06/362, Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources, Canberra.
McMichael, P. 1999, ‘Virtual capitalism and agri-food restructuring’, in D. Burch, J. Goss and G. Lawrence (eds), Restructuring Global and Regional Agricultures. Transformations in Australasian agri-food economies and spaces, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 3–22.
Marchant, G. E. and Sylvester, D. J. 2006, ‘Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology’, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 714–25.
Market Attitudes Research Services 2004, Short Report: Australian community opinion towards nanotechnology and the commercialisation of scientific research, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Canberra.
Maynard, A. 2006, Nanotechnology: A research strategy for addressing risks, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Mee, W., Lovel, R., Solomon, F. et al. 2004, Nanotechnology: The Bendigo workshop, CSIRO Minerals, Melbourne.
Miller, G. and Kinnear, S. 2007, ‘Nanotechnology—the new threat to food’, Clean Food Organic, vol. 4, May.
Monica, J. C., Heintz, M. E. and Lewis, P. T. 2007, ‘The perils of pre-emptive regulation’, Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 2, pp. 68–70.
National Nanotechnology Strategy Taskforce (NNST) 2006, Options for a national nanotechnology strategy, Report to Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources, National Nanotechnology Strategy Taskforce, Canberra.
Nel, A., Xia, T., Madler, L. and Li, N. 2006, ‘Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel’, Science, vol. 311, pp. 622–7.
Oberdörster, G. et al. 2005, ‘Review: principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy’, Particle and Fibre Toxicology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1–35.
Phillips, P. 2002, ‘International trade in genetically-modified agri-food products’, in C. Moss, G. Rausser, A. Schmitz, T. Taylor and D. Zilberman (eds), Agricultural Globalization, Trade and the Environment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 503–20.
Roco, M. C. and Bainbridge, W. S. 2005, ‘Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: maximising human benefit’, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 7, pp. 1–13.
Rooker, J. 2006, ‘Keeping a hand in nanotechnology’, Chemistry and Industry, September, pp. 19–21.
Rowan, D. 2004, ‘Are scientists putting you off your dinner?’, The Guardian, 16 May.
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering 2004, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties, Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, London.
Sandler, R. and Kay, W. D. 2006, ‘The national nanotechnology initiative and the social good’, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 675–81.
Scrinis, G. and Lyons, K. 2007, ‘The emerging nano-corporate paradigm and the transformation of agri-food systems’, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food.
Swiss Re 2004, Nanotechnology: Small matter, many unknowns, Swiss Re, Geneva.
Taylor, M. R. 2006, Regulating the Products of Nanotechnology: Does FDA have the tools it needs?, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Tip Top n.d., Tip Top Up Omega 3 DHA, Marketing case study, Tip Top.
van Calster, G. 2006, ‘Regulating nanotechnology in the European Union’, Nanotechnology Law & Business, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 359–72.
Wardark, A. 2003, Nanotechnology & Regulation: A case study using the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), Foresight Institute and Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Weiss, J., Takhistov, P. and McClements, J. 2006, ‘Functional materials in food nanotechnology’, Institute of Food Technologists, vol. 71, no. 9.
Williams, C. 2007, ‘Big talks over small tech.’, Mass High Tech: The Journal of New England Technology, 15 June, <http://masshightech.bizjournals.com/masshightech/stories/2007/06/18/story1.html>
Woodrow Wilson 2006, Report Findings Based on a National Survey of Adults, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Woodrow Wilson 2007, A Nanotechnology Consumer Product Inventory, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, DC, <http://www.nanotechproject.org/index.php?id=44&action=view>