Part Two – Preparing the Ground: Balance, Proportionality, and Public Perceptions
Prev
Next
Part Two – Preparing the Ground: Balance, Proportionality, and Public Perceptions
Table of Contents
Chapter 5. Balancing Security and Liberty: Critical Perspectives on Terrorism Law Reform
Introduction: The Balancing Model
The Critique of Balancing
The Making of Terrorism Law:Uncivil Politics of Law Reform
Preventative, Pre-emptive and Precautionary Models of Counter-Terrorism Law
Conclusion
Chapter 6. Lay Perceptions of Terrorist Acts and Counter‑Terrorism Responses
Introduction
Exceptionalism and Siege Mentality
Use of ‘Motive’ in the Definition of Australian Terrorist Act Offences
The Empirical Research
Design
Adapting Bar-Tal’s Siege Mentality Scale
Participants and Data Collection
Materials/Procedure
Results
Conclusions
Chapter 7. The Proportionality Principle in the Context of Anti‑Terrorism Laws
Introduction
The Proportionality Principle in the Context of Derogation from the European Convention of Human Rights
Justifications for the Margin of Appreciation
Critique of the Justifications for the Margin of Appreciation
The Question of Proportionality and the
Belmarsh Detainees
Decision
The Majority Approach to the Threat of Terrorism
The Dissentient Approach to the Threat of Terrorism
Conclusion